(530) 798-2417
druderman@chwlaw.us
David Ruderman currently serves as City Attorney for the Cities of Lakeport, Sonoma, and Weed and General Counsel of the California Community Choice Financing Authority, Tahoe Forest Hospital District, and Yuba LAFCO. He is also Senior Counsel in Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley’s litigation practice group. David’s litigation and advisory practice covers a range of public law issues, including municipal finance and public revenues, public utilities, LAFCO matters, land use, cannabis regulation, election law, employment law, and general contract and commercial disputes.
In David’s advisory practice, he has extensive experience with code enforcement, municipal finance/Proposition 218 matters, election law, labor relations, land use, planning, and CEQA issues raised by projects large and small. He has extensive experience abating public nuisances both on an administrative level and in court, as well as obtaining reimbursement from the property owner and others for abatement costs. He has assisted in the formation and governance of joint powers agencies, drafted ordinances amending zoning codes and General Plans and regularly advises on CEQA issues, as well as litigating such cases. His labor practice includes not only general advice regarding bargaining, but also defending cities from unfair labor practice charges before PERB. He also regularly provides ethics training to local elected official under AB 1234 and presentations to local government staff on legal compliance issues.
David has broad litigation experience in both state and federal courts, which he uses to help is advisory clients avoid court where possible and desired. Among his litigation experience, David recently obtained a published opinion on behalf of the City of Ventura that found United Water Conservation District’s pumping charges, and the statute on which they were based, were unconstitutional. (City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation District (2022) 79 Cal.App.5th 110.) He has also obtained a published opinion affirming a preliminary injunction enjoining the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Pasadena: Urgent Care Medical Services v. City of Pasadena (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 1086. This success was preceded by another appellate victory, where he obtained reversal of a trial court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in Vallejo’s efforts to enforce its medical marijuana ordinance: City of Vallejo v. NCORP4, Inc. (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1078. He successfully defended on appeal his trial court victory in a taxpayers’ lawsuit challenging the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District’s decision not to call an election on a referendum to a water supply charge the District adopted under Proposition 218. He also not long ago successfully defended a California Public Records Act case for a coastal city, averting an award of attorneys’ fees, and succeeded in having a local initiative that would have led to litigation with its bargaining units and CalPERS taken off the ballot after the trial court found it clearly invalid.
David serves as a hearing officer for Nevada County in nuisance abatement, administrative citation, and cannabis cultivation appeals. His recent speaking engagements include “Sharing the Wealth: A Deep Dive into Tax Exchange under Revenue & Taxation Code Section 99,” for the July 2022 CALAFCO (California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions) University Webinar, “The Cannabis Conundrum: How to Extinguish Illegal Marijuana Businesses” at the League of California Cities Spring City Attorneys’ Conference in May 2019, and “Deep Dive into Municipal Service Reviews: One size does not fit all,” at the June 2019 CALAFCO University. David currently serves on the League of California Cities’ Legal Advocacy Committee and Cannabis Regulation Committee.
David was admitted to the California State Bar in December 2006, after receiving his J.D. from UCLA School of Law in 2006. While at UCLA, David was a managing editor of the UCLA Law Review and worked as a judicial extern for the Honorable Harry Pregerson of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Prior to attending law school, David served as a Peace Corps volunteer in the Russian Far East and provided immigration legal services to émigrés from the former Soviet Union to the San Francisco Bay Area. He graduated with honors from Lewis & Clark College with a major in History in 1997. David is proficient in Russian.
Practice Areas:
- Public Law
- Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Law
- Public Finance Law
- Election Law
- Land Use / CEQA
- Cannabis Regulation and Litigation
- Opening Meeting and Records Laws
- Joint Exercise of Powers Act
- Public Utilities
- Alternative Dispute Resolution